(this review first appeared in The Literary Review)
Courting Songs
In
his introduction to Alan Dugan’s Poems (1961), Dudley Fitts notes, “a
strangeness…and extraordinary tension, too, in spite of the greyness of diction
and versification.” No one has more aptly described the peculiar effect of Dugan’s
poetry. From the publication of his first book in 1961 his work has intrigued
and perhaps repelled readers with a deep irony and self-defacement that
challenges not only the pieties of culture but of poetry itself. Since Lowell’s Life Studies
and Ginsberg’s Howl fully opened poetry to the unadulterated voice of
the self, American poetry has dwelt on psychological nuance, sometimes to the
extreme of embracing a maudlin solipsism. Nothing could be further from that
sentimentality than Dugan’s gruff realism. Although his poems often speak in
the first person, their voice attains an air of objectivity that quashes all
pretensions of the ego. What are we to make of a poet who writes,
I’ve
promised that I will not care about things,
person, or myself,
but I do. For example:
my house looks
like a set for a New England tragedy
but it isn’t.
Outside it looks like a dump.
What it’s like
inside I’m too arrogant to describe
although we’re
happy for whole moments at a time
during this “life
is pain” phenomenon. (“Untitled Poem”)
Fitts observes that “it is
something to be able to bring damp chaos under a modicum of control,” while
noting that such formulations cannot account for the strangeness, which is
unteachable and perhaps beyond critique because so difficult to define. Dugan’s
plain diction and simple constructions eschew the notion of order through
elaboration of form, but embrace instead the possibility that order exists in
its own right, as an element of chaos itself. Fitts’ usual acumen fails him
here: that chaos may even be form is an idea that haunts these poems,
throwing into doubt the utility of Eliot’s (and all of modernism’s) project of
shoring fragments against the ruins. This is just one of Dugan’s various
challenges to cultural and social axioms.
Dugan’s
ironic detachment seems strange because it applies to the voice—the speaker—of
the poem, whether first or third person, as well as to the ostensible subject.
Eventually the reader understands that the voice is always the actual subject,
and that Dugan’s poetry is concerned with psychological nuance in the same way
as Ford’s Good Soldier. That is, rather than indulging in
self-examination, producing a poem of introversion (with all its consequent
concealments), Dugan engages in self-exposure, which is as rare in poetry as it
is in life. When he writes of Orpheus, “Singing, always singing, he was
something / of a prig, like Rilke, and as dangerous / to women” (“Orpheus”), we understand that he is
exposing himself. But lest we take that for granted, consider how much
supposedly confessional verse would admit that the speaker is a prig and
dangerous to women.
Just
in case readers of the 1961 collection didn’t understand that these strictures
apply to the speaker himself, Dugan returns to the theme of danger to women in
his later poems, most explicitly in “Courting Song: Attack! Attack! Attack!”:
Oh I approached
and bowed.
She turned away. I
ran around
in front of her
and bowed.
She turned away. I
ran beside
her till she
stopped. I bowed.
She turned away. I
ran around in front
of her again and
bowed and cooed.
Oh she lay down
and sighed.
Then, Wham, Bang,
Thank you Ma’am
I got her where
she lived
and nearly died.
That this poem is spoken in the
voice of a pigeon will not appease those who find it sexist, antisocial, or in
some other way an affront to the pieties of the day. But Dugan’s task is not to
appease anyone’s pieties, including his own. His task, as Thoreau says of his
own work, is to “drive life into a corner, and reduce it to its lowest terms,
and, if it prove[s] to be mean, why then to get the whole and genuine meanness
of it….” The detachment and powerful sense of reality required for this work is
difficult to find in a sentimental age.
Most especially,
to detach one’s self from the self and see it as others might is an unusual
act, and only infrequently encountered in literature. Usually, introspective
literature romanticizes personal suffering, and exposes faults in terms that
encourage our sympathy. Dugan neither encourages nor allows sympathy on the
part of the reader, and if the speaker indulges in it, ridicules him. A poet
who can ask, “Why feel guilty because the death of a lover causes lust?” is
unlikely to require our sympathy, and will satisfy himself with our attention.
Perhaps
all ages are sentimental; ours certainly is, and this is why Dugan, despite
having won a Pulitzer Prize and recently his second National Book Award,
appears in few anthologies and remains relatively unknown. His earthy
irreverence is witty enough to make the Sphinx crack a smile, but the current
literary establishment is committed to poetry that for the most part would
strike Sarah Teasdale as too timid to bother with. “Old Billy Dugan, shot in
the ass in the Civil War,” speaks against whole worlds of cowardly politics and
aesthetics when he notes, “The North won the Civil War / without much help from
me / although I wear a proof / of the war’s obscenity” (“Fabrication of
Ancestors”).
This detached yet
committed voice links the ancient world to the present, suggesting that Dugan’s
models are more likely to be Horace and Catullus than T. S. Eliot or Wallace
Stevens. Horace might have noted that, “The Augean stables were so full of
horseshit / that the Augean nobles came to laugh at Hercules / when he was told
to muck them out by hand” (“Marxist Analysis of the Fifth Labor of Hercules”),
while Catullus surely wrote the poem on the facing page: “‘Pray for me and die
rotten,’ the men’s- / room wall read. ‘I don’t want a drink,’ / the old whore
said. ‘You know what I / want. Come on. Come on. Come on’” (“Memories of the
Bowery”).
Fitts notes that
“this is not a young poetry,” and, “Neither is it an elaborately wrought
poetry.” The diction is plain, the roots are deep and classical, and the voice
is mature. Poems Seven, Dugan’s recent collection, contains all of his
work from his Yale Younger Poets book to the present. Fitts’ characterizations
apply to the most recent work as well as the earliest. The consistency of the
voice is remarkable. It is the consistency of a hard-earned perfection,
however, and does not limit Dugan’s ability to engage almost any subject,
theme, or problem. “Closing Time at the Second Avenue Deli,” the final poem of
this four-hundred page collection, gently (for Dugan) mocks the notion of
metaphor, the very basis of poetry:
This
is not the time for metaphors. This
is the time
to turn out the lights, and yes,
imagine it, those two ketchup
bottles
will stand there all night long
as acrobatic metaphors of balance,
of emptiness, of fullness perfectly
contained,
of any metaphor you wish unless
the manager snaps his fingers at the
door,
goes back, and separates them for
the night
from that unnatural balance….
Metaphor, we realize, is
only a rhetorical device, while even ketchup bottles possess an actuality
independent of what we say about them. This is not necessarily a fashionable
idea, but in the materiality of the world and the self Dugan finds the antidote
to intellectual, moral, and aesthetic pretensions. Facing down these
pretensions requires courage, but instead of locating that virtue in himself
Dugan finds it in creatures like the hermit crab for “doing what he thinks he
has to do / while shrinking” (“Life Comparison”). Courage in the face of one’s own cowardice is
a necessary virtue in Dugan’s world, but he is too modest (though he mocks his
own modesty) to claim it for himself, so I claim it for him. Few poets have for
so long remained unflinchingly true to an original vision, few have written, as
Dugan has, poems of old age that retain the virility of his youthful work, and
fewer still have so long defied the forces of sentiment and fashion.
Alan Dugan, Poems Seven: New and Complete Poetry.
New York:
Seven Stories Press, 2001. ISBN 1-58322-265-0. $35, hardcover.
No comments:
Post a Comment